Naval Operation “One Eyed Snake”

“The Christmas ornament, named “EA-18G Growler Sky ‘Art’ Christmas Ornament,” is available for sale on the Planeform website for $10.” – story here

“Grab your ankles and say your prayers because Sammy Clause comes tonight!”

I recently saw this article,  Navy admits to being involved in obscene contrails in Okanogan Co., shared in a Facebook post, where it is alleged that a Navy Growler pilot out of Whidbey Island Naval Station drew a huge penis in the sky with his contrail. At first I am inclined to think this is a false story, perhaps using a doctored image generated by one of the many mainstream news agencies or pseudo-alternative sites that have aligned themselves with deep state actors.  It seems the kind of story that gets picked up on by the masses and goes venereal (a more appropriate term than “viral” I think) like so many other dumb-down stories that populate the media. When the US Navy leadership came out and took responsibility for this giant penis, however, this becomes something much more significant.


Civilian Guinea Pigs

Having learned previously of the controversy surrounding the electronic warfare training   being authorized by the public trust managers at the Olympic National Forest,  my first thought is that this would be a shout-out from a news reporting organization with the intention to minimize the environmental concerns of the Western Washington locals about the Navy’s electronic warfare gaming plans.  (I encourage people to check out the very contentious Hearings on this from 2014)

In true totalitarian state propaganda fashion, perhaps the current military aligned media would want to insult those who would ever think that the military would be engaging in anything nefarious; be it EM warfare or stratospheric aerosol spraying. I believe this was partly the case. Further investigation into this led me to an actual statement from a Navy Commander

“The actions of this air crew were wholly unacceptable. These actions were irresponsible, inexcusable, immature and antithetical to the core values of naval aviation and the Navy,” said Cmdr. Ron Flanders, spokesman of the North Island-based Naval Air Forces.

This Commander took responsibility for the incident and apologized, reassuring the public that they would get to the bottom of this and hold the pilot(s) responsible. Upon doing this, the light sentence being revealed, along with the lack of probing inquiry from the public and the Naval leadership suggests to me that this incident is being severely marginalized and categorized as “harmless tomfoolery” under this all-too apathetic national “status quo”. (Far too many times I’ve seen the leadership in these bureaucratic organizations take “full responsibility” for the actions of their organizations and absolve themselves of any culpability and consequence). The article goes on to report the following:

“Authorities have not named the crew of the EA-18G Growler crafting the phallic contrails, but Flanders indicated that the pilot was a lieutenant assigned to Electronic Attack Squadron 130, the “Zappers” out of Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Wash.”

Another article on the matter reports the following about the punishment of these pilots:

“Although the review board could have easily ended the drivers’ flying careers, the officials reportedly ended up placing the aviators on a six-month probationary period, with a few conditions that amount to writing “I will not draw dicks in the sky” on a classroom chalkboard.”

(The Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral John M. Richards, who was cited in one of the articles as one of the high ranking officials being informed on this incident, is among those listed in a lawsuit being filed  by the Legal Alliance to Stop Geoengineering. So the plot thickens.)


Getting punched in the gut by the same “left- right” combination

With the coming together of the left and right over the climate change issue, as so powerfully demonstrated at the Idaho Climate Summit, there appears to be an advancement in the open financing and employment of geoengineering programs. This can be realized when you watch this congressional hearing from the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology that took place on Nov. 8, 2017.

As you’ll see in the congressional hearing on geoengineering linked above, much work has already taken place in this field and much more will be coming out; much of it from the well-funded Pacific Northwest National Laboratories right in our own back yard. (Might as well employ more of this geoengineering research out here in the Pacific Northwest; seeing as Idaho National Laboratories (INL) and Hanford have already turned this beautiful land into a toxic dumping ground and its population into guinea pigs).

(NOTE: INL was one of the sponsors at the Idaho Climate Summit. I encourage people who want to learn more about the nuclear energy insanity to visit the Fairwinds Energy website.)

It’s been my position all along that the left vs. right perception of climate change is a Hegelian dialectic set up which has been proven to play out in favor of globalization from both manufactured “sides”… exactly how it was intended to do. Part of this set-up would be the employment of geoengineering programs; which I would suggest is already taking place but is sure to become even more commonplace and less hidden (like cloud seeding already has become) as the global investments start to roll in and the same weather modification contractors get the green light from the prostitutes in the public trust organizations. What has taken place behind the scenes to condition pilots and scientists to deploy aerosols into the atmosphere, up to now, can only be speculated. With the government and private industry all aligned on the global warming issue, it is now just a matter of signing contracts and channeling public money openly into geoengineering programs. (Note this is all happening under a president who is playing the role of antithesis to the global warming thesis and doing nothing to oppose or shed light on the congressional hearings taking place on the subject of geoengineering. Perhaps because his role, as a low level employee of the deep state, doesn’t call for him to make an honest effort to resist the global agenda).

(For more on the left/ right climate change scam I strongly encouraged people read my last blog and watch the two documentaries by James Corbett; “How Big Oil Conquered the World” and “Why Big Oil Conquered the World”. The information in those documentaries is critical to understanding this set up.)

Maybe one day we can get over this toxic bantering and think for ourselves and, just maybe, pose a challenge to the sadistic globalist institutions that are reducing humanity to ruins by manifesting more toxic agendas through left-right set ups.


Here are a couple of questions that I think confound this ‘harmless penis in the sky’ narrative.

Question # 1– If this were just tomfoolery from a growler pilot doing “funny things” with his contrail, how was this pilot able to start and stop his trail when he made his (or her) phallic drawing? If “contrails” are a natural phenomenon and, according to the science, not able to be controlled by the pilot without employing some technology to suppress it  (which, even according to the debunkers is not feasible), how is the pilot able to do this?
Voice from the video: “Look he stopped it right there too. He’s trying to make a dick and balls.” (It would be of interest to hear from actual pilots on whether or not they would be able to do this with their contrail. I happen to know one so I’ll ask and see what this person has to say. So stay tuned…)

Question #2– Why has the penis in the sky story come to the attention of national news organizations while the more interesting, substantial and revelatory controversy over the electronic warfare training issue remained local and universally ignored by the mainstream media? Why am I the only one making the connection between the two stories?



I understand the dynamics in mainstream and much of the alternative media that incentivizes them to perpetuate the ridiculous perspectives over logical ones. Why, though, when I see stories like this penis in the sky, shared over Facebook and other relatively open social mediums, does the American public NOT consider more logical analysis and ask more probing questions? Are we getting dumber?

Being someone who is inclined to consider what I actually see with my own two eyes and having petitioned public trustees within my organization, and others, to speak to the observations over my head (persistent and expanding emissions from jet aircraft), I am left to wonder what exactly this penis in the sky is really about? In every case of inquiry to public trust managers about this, my questions are not answered. My direct questions on the matter remain unfalsified by any reasonable scientific process. If anything, when you inquire about stratospheric aerosol geoengineering to any agency, what you will get is a link to this government website, which provides a scientific analysis for “contrails” that doesn’t give a complete analysis that describes what I see going on over my head. What it states, in the overview of contrails, can be confounded by the observations being made by myself and many others and it certainly doesn’t answer my specific questions. The science certainly appears to be confounded by the giant penis drawing in the sky. In the absence of clear scientific falsification from public trust agencies, the discerning citizen is left to figure it out for himself. Many well researched perspectives on this, like what is provided by Clifford Carnicom and Dane Wigington  who make a compelling case for this being the deployment of geoengineering programs, describe in much more detail what I have observed. Their analysis is further supported by the lack of investigation and reflexive ignorance by every public trustee and public trust manager who is confronted with this information. (All suffering from the condition I refer to as “Trickle Down Psychopathy” as they look at you like you have a big contrail penis protruding from your forehead if you mention it).

I will leave you with this response from the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality to my inquiry into this issue in 2012. This will give the reader an example of how these observations become marginalized as the buck get’s passed up the ladder… eventually to where the smooth talking psychos live.

Response from IDEQ to my questions on geoengineering:

From: “” <>
Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 3:39 PM
Subject: Public Health Concern


Thank you for the email regarding your concerns over condensation trails in Idaho. We are aware of this issue and have been contacted in the past by individuals wanting to discuss similar concerns. Unfortunately we have no information on “chem” trails or any other chemical dispersion to provide. We recommend you contact the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regarding this issue.

Best Regards,

Michael Toole
Regional Airshed Coordinator
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
Boise Regional Office

Phone: (208) 373-0550


How much is your freedom worth at the Idaho Climate Summit?


This picture was sent to me from a friend who claimed it was taken by one of his friends near Leavenworth, WA. in September, 2017. Though I can’t confirm its authenticity, I put it here to convey my thoughts on what lies at the root to the madness we are experiencing through agenda 21 and other social engineering programs currently in play.

“When you dance with the devil the devil don’t change… the devil changes you.” – movie quote from “8mm”

Coming up next month (Nov. 16 & 17, 2017) three different Idaho campuses will be hosting the Idaho Climate Summit (CSI, BSU and U of I). Among the sponsors of this summit you will find a cornucopia of various public trust organizations, colleges, private enterprises, NGO’s (Nature Conservancy) and professional organizations (AFS, Wildlife Society) . In amongst these collaborators and sponsors are a number of relatively new companies that special in helping to build these broad collaboration efforts between all of these entities; to include the Langdon Group and Warm Springs Consulting (the Charlie’s Angels of Agenda 21)…

radio  Maurice

Maurice (Unofficial Biography) – “Good morning Angels”;



AngelsAngles (In Unison)- “Good Morning Maurice” ; Maurice– “How’s my favorite operatives?”; Angels“Anxiously awaiting our next assignment!”; Maurice– “That’s the spirit Angles! Let’s not dally then. Now that you’re in Idaho Angels I want you to use what you’ve learned in your various professions about ‘global harmonization’ and ‘relationship building’ and apply it to strengthening the collaborative institutional framework in order to maximize global institutional control over the local communities. I want you to convince the locals that this is for their own good, the good of the nation and the entire global community. Mind you Angels, this may not be an easy assignment! Those people in Idaho are stubborn about their rights and responsibilities as sovereign citizens; a real challenge for our friends at the Council.” Angels– “Don’t worry Maurice, we won’t let you down.”; Maurice– “I knew I could count on you Angels.” ; Angels– “Hey Maurice, when are we going to get together?” Maurice– “I’m afraid not any time soon darlings. I’ve got water resource business to tend to in Bolivia, local uprisings in Africa (2) and a number of nasty opposition forces from Contrarian Indians here in Canada. Plus, tonight I’m having an old friend for dinner… ‘slurp’.”

To the average concerned citizen, all this relationship building seems like a wonderful coming together of opposing forces (for example the two Climate Summit sponsors Monsanto and the Nature Conservancy). What many don’t realize, however, is that all these various entities have similar roots and have collaborated together for a very long time. This has been a collaborative effort that has very much included all the various public trust organizations. The reason we are even embroiled in this situation with resource exploitation, environmental degradation and a struggling economy is because of the deals all these entities have made over the years; all the while having appeared to always be at odds. (Very much key to this subjugation process).

If you go no farther in this blog post, please take the time to view the below linked documentaries by James Corbett. If you are an environmentalist who believes in the science on climate change or a conservative who thinks climate change is all hype, these videos (particularly the second video “Why Big Oil Conquered the World”), will give you a much more informed and balanced perspective.  Following these investigations will allow you to be infinitely more capable of separating the facts from fictions and the institutional rhetoric from the actually intentions.

How Big Oil Conquered the World:

Why Big Oil Conquered the World:

Where’s The Beef?


Take an assessment of your situation. Are you seeing less poverty around you? Is the overall health of the people in your communities improving (less cancer, heart attacks, autism, Alzheimer’s, autoimmune disorders, drugs, etc.…)? Are your health care premiums going down and less coming out of your paycheck to pay for your health insurance? Are the rural schools near where you live in good shape financially or otherwise and is this rural community existing independent of some form of government grants, farm subsidy, or globally aligned corporate entity from among the many industries… to include the tourism industry? Do you feel like you are free to speak your mind without retribution (to include “brow beatings”)? Is “global terrorism” anywhere perceived to be less of a problem? If all the NGO’s, government institutions, politicians, private enterprise and investment companies were interested in improving the health of the environment, the sovereignty and health and safety of its citizens and the strength and independence of its communities, given the disproportionate amount of the population’s wealth and resources that have been applied to achieving this, don’t you think we would have it by now? Why, instead, are we increasingly dependent on multiple forms of private and public charity and continuing to apply increasing and debilitating portions of our personal wealth to public entities (Federal and State governments)… entities that are trillions in debt to central banking institutions and foreign nations around the globe? It doesn’t take much research to come to logical explanations and evidence to support there being much more to this picture than what we are being made aware of. With the all these devolving situations in mind, coupled with the level of access we all have to well informed information, that confounds every official narrative, why aren’t we making any progress in rational thought?

My inclination as to why our collective awareness is stagnating is that collectively we are caught in the left/ right paradigm and finding little grounding outside this manufactured dialectic; a dialectic which is being daily reinforced and crafted by multiple forms of state and corporate sponsored news feeds. (The corporate news agency I am most disgusted with locally is the one we in the public trust organizations seem to hold in the highest regard, the Idaho Statesman). Even with all the control of information, there seems to be a broad growth in average awareness. I’ve listened to many friends and family tell me they don’t believe anything they read in the papers and see on the tell-lie-vision anymore, because they recognize how blatantly ridiculous it has become. (How the fuck could you not recognize how ridiculous it has become?!!). None of this awareness, however, seems to translate to progress in any meaningful way. I suggest this is due to the institutional framework that holds the citizenry hostage and in a state of servitude. This institutional framework operates in opposition to natural laws and freedoms and is empowered through international corporate sponsorships programming by way of these ‘climate summit’ and various other public/ private collaborations. (I’ve written about this extensively in previous blogs (LINK 2).

Therefore, the most egregious condition and biggest obstacle to real progress, in my opinion, is the disturbing disconnect from reality that exists within the organizations of government and among the politicians. All the places the average citizen is forced to go in order to meet their basic needs, access vital information and seek redress of grievances are in no way grounded in common sense (or common law! and very much conditioned by the left/ right firewalls. Meanwhile, at the top of all of these entities, they remain beholden to the “good old boys clubs” and global think tanks like the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)  for example. Bringing this home; I just recently learned that there is a local chapter of the CFR in Boise when I read an article in the Idaho Statesman written by the chairman of that organization, Richard Slaughter, who gave his opinion on gun control following the Las Vegas shooting. I don’t know Mr. Slaughter, but, given his position with the CFR, I would certainly expect he would promote the CFR’s globalist agendas in all public matters. Absolutely this organization would be interested in reducing your capacity as a citizen to defend your rights to protect yourself against a tyrannical global government. Establishing a global government is the primary goal of the CFR whose massively integrated organization is the glue that holds all the various agendas together; including this global governance through climate change agenda (right along with the military industrial and human rights industrial complexes, big pharmaceutical industry, tech industry and industrial agriculture). The existence of this organization and their unequal access to the leadership of this nation (actually their control over the leadership of this nation) is a very good case in point as to why we must keep our right to keep and bear arms! Other nations in their crosshairs; Syria, Ukraine, Libya, Yugoslavia, etc. … are clear examples of what could very easily transpire here at home under the guidance of the CFR (often times using contemporary and historic victims of their crimes to bring their modern agendas to fruition; in the form of mass migration and displaced reparations for their human rights abuses).

I like my job and need the income… but the top down Orwellian programming is unbearable. The ‘coming together’ mantra where we continue to contribute public money to support this melding of private and public enterprise, to the benefit of the bureaucracy at the expense of local autonomy, is extremely inappropriate and wouldn’t fly if enough people inside and outside these organizations took the time to figure out what is going on. Shame on the progressives for being too lazy to follow their money up the ladder of their favorite ‘do good’ organizations and recognizing how financially compromised their favorite politicians and pundits have become. Shame on them for legitimizing the concerns of the conservatives by maintaining a religious devotion to modern day eugenics. Shame on the conservatives for not recognizing the international corporation and banking structures and the military industrial complex that dictate to the public and private entities they trust and the politicians and pundits they subscribe to. Shame on them for legitimizing the liberal’s concerns by keeping the conversation about ‘jobs’, ‘economy’, ‘fighting terrorism’, etc. (and holding on to 9/11 lies and the “drain the swamp” dreams that clearly were never the intention) and NOT about local sovereignty and the global banking scam! (It continues to be the case that the conservative condition depends on a host of similar fallacies of logic to validate their positions; fallacies of justification that go on to be used to maximize resource exploitation and intrusive polices that subjugate and otherwise diminish the local communities, every bit as well as ‘environmentalism’).

Welcome to the Circle


“Whether the whites won the land by treaty, by armed conquest, or, as was actually the case, by a mixture of both, mattered comparatively little so long as the land was won. It was all-important that it should be won, for the benefit of civilization and in the interests of mankind. It is indeed a warped, perverse, and silly morality which would forbid a course of conquest that has turned whole continents into the seats of mighty and flourishing civilized nations. All men of sane and wholesome thought must dismiss with impatient contempt the plea that these continents should be reserved for the use of scattered savage tribes, whose life was but a few degrees less meaningless, squalid, and ferocious than that of the wild beasts with whom they held joint ownership.” – Theodore Roosevelt

What comes out of the division of ideologies described in the previous sections of this post? A technocratic ‘middle ground’; which you will find in spades at The Idaho Climate Summit!! (I encourage you to go to the website link for this event and check out all the sponsors and look into programs like ‘Human Centered Design’. Just the fact that this international organization’s system oriented strategy is the process by which Idaho is using to build collaboration tells you that this Climate Summit is not a genuine “Idaho-grown, Idaho-driven effort to build understanding of how Idaho’s climate is changing and a way to help Idahoans build solutions to Idaho’s changing climate”, as the Idaho Fish and Game’s Public Relations department would have us believe. It tells you this is a part of a much broader collaboration of global organizations with an agenda.

Excerpt from the IDEO “What if we had a new way to design products, services, and businesses that were good for people, the planet, and business? That’s one of the questions we were seeking to answer when IDEO teamed up with the Ellen MacArthur Foundation to launch the Circular Design Guide.
Why a design thinking guide for the circular economy? Design thinking is a great innovation tool for tackling complex systemic challenges. It not only offers an approach that generates momentum through prototyping, but also strengthens insight around what works (and what doesn’t). This new guide is meant to help innovators create more elegant, effective, and creative solutions for the circular economy.” Welcome to the Circle!!

A plan to harmonize everyone into a system of decision making that considers everyone’s needs (the global community) over the individual’s needs and responsibilities is a recipe for disaster as the institutions (public and private) gain a huge advantage over every individual. (Ask the people of Grant Township Pennsylvania how much weight their need for clean water carries over the world’s need for oil… and how much EPA cares! Ask the wholly government dependent and incorporated (far from sovereign) Native American tribes how much freedom they got out of collaborating with occupying governments and private institutions in the past; their subjugation foisted upon them in the form of religious indoctrinations (through global corporate churches), global trade schemes (Hudson Bay Company) and government treaties (too many to list). (LINK) I guess they got to survive, as long as they submitted to being assimilated . What we are seeing today is the progression of the same thing by the same international governing public and private institutions operating around the world and here at home (Fabian style). We are all being assimilated. The modern reservations are the mega cities and the once ‘fierce settler’ that was so instrumental and praised, by the likes of Teddy Roosevelt for their services in the occupation of Indian land are now the modern indigenous people that don’t quite fit the (Human Centered) design. In this design you either sign up for the subsidies and produce for the global distribution chains and box stores or you pack it up and move to the city where you can serve this paradigm on another (usually much lower) level. If what you are doing comes into conflict with this design (that is forever being streamlined by computer processors and toxic technologies (like what you will find at Post Falls, Idaho based FARB Guidance Systems) you are no longer competitive or become a target. A fine example of this can be seen in the case of the Hammond Family, the Bundy Family, Air Force Veteran Mark Baker and the Lunny Family … just a few of many examples of how this tyranny manifests on the local level. We even have Teddy’s great (x?) grandchildren, Theodore R. IV and V working within the banking institutions and serving on the Council of Foreign Relations while buying up land in places like Montana and contributing to many of the major ‘environmental’ organizations (petitioning local government for reduced tax rates while petitioning for higher taxes on the global community! What a globalist asshole! Are we really this ignorant? Do we actually think the heavily Rockefeller Foundation supported “Nature Conservancy” has our best interests at heart?).

Breaking Through the Firewall

beaver dam

“While a system of holding people in hostage is as old as the oldest war, a fresher note is introduced when a tyrannic state is at war with its own subjects and may hold any citizen in hostage with no law to restrain it. An even more recent improvement is the subtle use of what I shall term “the lever of love” (applied so successfully by the Soviets) of tying a rebel to his wretched country by his own twisted heart strings”.  ~Vladimir Nabokov

The most important thing that can be done under our current circumstances (limited and diminishing access to sound information, corrupted public trust institutions, corrupt politicians and corporate news media and the many multiple toxic private/ public collaborations) is to spread rational and sound information and grow awareness… hopefully inspire people to ask more probing questions and look at things from a different perspective. I’ve been at this a while now and have yet to get any readership (probably more a reflection of my rambling writing style than anything) nor have I seen much in the way of meaningful limitations on the progress of Agenda 21/ 2030 in the institutions of public trust. (Speak the words “Agenda 21” at a public meeting and you’ll get blank stares or a look of consternation from the presenters and participants… which, I think, is a result of the obstacles to the free flow of information along with the mainstream media mishandling of this agenda. I would also suggest this is a result of the conservative ‘mishandling’ of the issue, as they’ve attached this agenda to a modern case of misguided environmentalism rather than exposing it as a continuation of a long standing left AND RIGHT eugenics operation). Ultimately it is the institutional road block that I think poses the biggest challenge. Having a growing awareness among the average citizens, while important, does little when their only capacity to act on their knowledge is to petition the institutions that are forever being infiltrated by global think tanks and indoctrinated into ‘the Circle’. (Not understanding the Hegelian process and how it plays into this on a fundamental level is huge).

At this point I think it is safe to consider that all branches of government are compromised, including the Judiciary which is operating under long established corporate laws developed by powerful individuals that have been cleverly laid over the common law. This situation necessitates that any suitable response must take place outside the current political and judicial landscape, as politics as usual has become a huge albatross to our individual rights and responsibilities as sovereign citizens. Because there remains this huge firewall between those citizens who are conscious of these various agendas and a reasonable and open discussion platform, with access to politicians and public trust organizations, it seems the various grass roots special interest organizations would be the place to try and educate. Perhaps encourage these organizations to challenge their own perceptions with the follow-on consequence of influencing the various public-trust institutions who have already established a rapport with them. A true coming together of citizen organizations that are grounded in common law principles and fundamental understanding (of history and group think methodologies) might more effectively resist this Orwellian/ Huxleyan take over. It seems it would be effective to have a representative from organization like the Nez Perce Tribe together with outdoor sportsman’s groups having an information booth at the Climate Summit where they offer James Corbett’s “Why Big Oil Conquered the World”. It seems it would be more effective for environmental groups like DamSense to challenge the dams through common law and focus on bringing the cost for reparations to bear on the creators of the criminal enterprises that continue to use international banking, water and power distribution and many other toxic technologies to subjugate, diminish and displace indigenous peoples (both traditional and modern).

The following efforts are those I feel are challenging this paradigm in the most effective way; targeting the condition at the source and working to reestablish common laws.

  • Grant Township– The first link below is to a local article on the efforts being taken by the community of Grant Township in their battle to prevent fracking wastewater being stored near their local water supplies. The second link is to the CELDF organization that is helping to establish the lawful framework to empower Grant Township in their fight against the oil-fracking company and the state and federal governments. Grant Township Article


  • Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund–  “The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund is a non-profit, public interest law firm providing free and affordable legal services to communities facing threats to their local environment, local agriculture, local economy, and quality of life. Its mission is to build sustainable communities by assisting people to assert their right to local self-government and the rights of nature.”It is important to recognize that this Global Rights of Nature Alliance and CELDF are also susceptible to the conditioning that all the other NGO, private and public organizations are susceptible to. You can see a toxic manifestation of this in the national parks within the country of New Zealand; where the rights of nature at a national park are arbitrarily defined by a group of connected individuals whose perceptions have been developed by the indoctrinating institutions within the Agenda 21/2030 framework. The concept of the rights of nature, when governed by the natural laws of the universe and inclusive of ALL of its modern indigenous peoples and directed by research input that is open and instructive rather that subjugated is worth striving for. I encourage people to learn more about the proximity principle and natural laws of the universe).


  • In Power Movement – The InPower Docu-Series illustrates a powerful new method to restore social justice and accountability. Episode #1 focuses on solving the ‘smart’ meter problem: how we can prevent and reverse the installation of this dangerous technology, through holding corporate executives and government actors financially accountable — for the first time ever. And in so doing, we can restore safety in our homes, and bring balance to our world.


  • People’s Republic of Kanata– This is an effort to reestablish common law and break away from the crown of England up in Canada, coming from the work of Kevin Annette and others who convened to bring about an international human rights case against the government of Canada, the Crown of England and the Roman Catholic Church You can listen to their weekly broadcast on BBC radio on Sundays at 3:00 PM Pacific time here .

Welcome to PRIME TIME 2017!


Infinite love is the only truth, everything else is illusion– David Icke

It appears we may be reaching a critical mass of swamp rats at the helm of most every institution the civilized societies have come to depend on for their existence. All institutions great and small, be they private or public, philanthropic, militaristic, economic, educational, entertainment, and news, even weather. You name it, if it’s an institution that is influential to your life decisions “they” have either “got it by the balls” (on the right) or “grabbed them by their pussy” (on the left) and made it into something that subjugates.

In my blog post “Trickle down Psychopathy in America”  I presented my views on how I see psychopathy manifest in otherwise normal, empathetic and even “enlightened” people. Even people who I would consider much more caring, responsible and giving than most (certainly more than I) are attaching themselves to some of the most ridiculous con-jobs their taxes, fees and private investments can buy; con-operations that are being run by organizations and individuals whose contrasting loyalties can be exposed with minimal effort. Whole populations of people, guided by their blind trust in others, let these influential people’s perceptions of things become THEIR perceptions without analyzing the very fundamental tenants of their particular viewpoint, their potential ulterior motivations and their conflicts of interest. (Rational ignorance and system dependency are the two conditions that come to mind).

Because of the level of entrainment of human energy and human potential being channeled into a system that promotes social entropy rather than self-sufficiency and individual autonomy, the only effective form of resistance may be to pull away as much as possible in as many ways as possible; starve the beast essentially. This may seem counter intuitive given the degree of moral decay and the ever growing violence that seems to warrant our direct attention, but without doing the necessary inner work and evidence based perception building, there can be no way to know if what we are promoting is actually helping or hurting. (A good article that speaks to this energy syphoning can be found here. This article details the con operations of the “Human Rights Industrial Complex”). In this paradigm, the simple act of paying your taxes or putting money in the offering plate at church can be deemed immoral and anathema to building a peaceful and lawful society (probably always was the case if you strip away the façade built by centuries of manufactured perceptions).

  • One relatively evident con-job where this entrainment into social entropy can be easily observed is in the call to arms following the 9/11 false flag attacks. I would encourage people to start delving into this issue. (Here is a video of an attempt to encourage conversation on this issue, Conversation with Firefighters on 9/11 False Flag event). This is one of the most blatant and observable lies out there and a good way to get past the wall of ignorance that has been built around so many other situations. The only way it is able to persist is because the majority; particularly amongst the public trust agencies, law enforcement and firefighters have been conditioned to ignore the evidence. Break the silence here and bring to justice the ACTUAL conspirators behind those attacks and I think humanity has a chance.


Revelations from a local Yogi

Fortunately expanding your mind doesn’t make your head bigger. But to those who don’t, you may look like you have a penis growing out the front of it. – Chuck Finney

As was pointed out by a wise yoga teacher recently, the year 2017 is a prime number, not divisible by any other. Contemplating this through the yoga practice I thought about the word “prime”. While in my favorite position, shavasina (corpse pose), to keep from falling asleep and disturbing the class with my snoring, I started doing the numerology in my head: 2+0+1+7 = 10 = 1. When was the last “prime” year? Did you know that if you add up each year in numerology you will keep repeating one through nine over and over? The last time it added up to 10 (“10” is “1” in numerology) was in 2008. (Stock Market Crash? O-bomber elected to office following 8 years of war-monger in chief, G.W. Bush, riding in on a platform of “peace” and “prosperity” only to continue the same policies… killing and destroying while taking home a dandy Nobel Peace Prize! WTF!!??) The next prime before that was 1999. Anything significant happen there?

I started thinking about the word “prime” and its synonyms: major, main, key, chief, leading, crucial, principle, primary. Prime is the root word of “primal” as in “primal instinct”. The American Heritage Dictionary defines the word as this; “the earliest or beginning stage of something”; logically meaning that it would also imply the ending of something else?  The Mayan calendar ended in 2012. (2+0+1+2 = 5). To the uninitiated layperson, the end of the world prophecy was a bust… just like Y2K. To the initiated and deep researcher, however; those who look past the politics of fear and perception control paradigms; this time period was seen for what it was… a time of change. For these researchers, 2012 was the ending of an alchemical cycle and the start of a 4 year period of significant changes ending in the more significant year of 2016 (2+0+1+6 = 9); a time period symbolically represented in the Lord of the Rings battle for Middle Earth.

(Most of my shivasina revelations are just me trying to figure shit out. For more on numerology, symbology and esoteric information, I highly recommend viewing and reading the works of artist Neil HagueLaura Eisenhower, David Icke, Mark Passio and Michael S. Schneider)


In Conclusion

Maybe the prime year of 2017 is the year we get back to the basics. Maybe this is the year we stop pretending like we “know” anything and start asking some very basic questions; like “who we are” and “why are we here?” What is our primary purpose as a species and how do we fit in to this universe?

Excerpt from Julian Rose essay “Why Humanity Must Come Through”:
“Some say the World, battered and bruised as it is, will be better-off without man.
That freed from its chief oppressor, Gaia will more assuredly survive and heal; will find her equilibrium anew and come through – restored. It is quite easy to sympathize with this view, not least because it seems to provide an answer to those who feel closer to nature than to their fellow humans – and can see no redemption for a mankind so determinedly set on the path of self destruction.
Yet, even when taking into account the tragic mismanagement of humanity’s journey thus far, I do not consider this to be any kind of answer. For, it is my contention, that with man out of the picture, the advancement of universal equilibrium – however erratic – will be completely arrested. On the macro-cosmic level, I believe a world without human beings would constitute a major set-back for the entire universe. And at the micro-cosmic level, a major set back for the plant, animal and insect kingdom as well.”

I started this process of trying to understand things on a deeper level after picking up on the deceptions surrounding Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential race. Since that time I’ve come to other researchers far out ahead of me in this and have gained some incredible perspectives. There has certainly been many charlatans along the way (like those who would take you to the next level of fear porn and sell you on a 2012 end of the world scenario), but if you approach this learning process from the heart and not the ego you can avoid some of those pit falls. If you pick up on the “primary” reasons that drive those that would operate to deceive and their “primary” incentives I think you will get much farther.
I don’t really see how things can get much weirder in this world (knock on wood). I can see the potential for a great deal more suffering, as the façade surrounding the seemingly benevolent governing institutions of the world continues to fade away. The farther this progresses the more people might want to start listening to what some of what these fringe thinkers have to say; once they get past the dialectic conditioning that entrains them into thinking they have only 2 or 3 manufactured solutions to the manufactured problems we face.

The more the system show’s itself for what it REALLY is, the more people might start to exhibit some neurotic behaviors, perhaps turning more dark and apathetic as well as becoming more anxious and emboldened to act. This is a condition that manifests when people focus on their growing contempt toward their “opposition”. Understand that this too is a ruse. When you get to this point take a few breaths and relax. Come along on this Journey of discovery… NOW is the prime time!

Letter to Trump


Dear Mr. President,

I am writing to you to inquire about concerns I have with many of your positions and policies and your staff picks that seem to demonstrate a willingness to “maintain the swamp” rather than drain it and to maintain the status quo in terms of the power dynamics in Washington DC. Conservative friends of mine, who hold libertarian ideals, support your presidency with the assumption that you are anti-globalist and have a plan that will lead to moves toward making good on your campaign promises. I challenged their assumptions and put forth information that suggests your selection to office is part of a bigger plan by the deep-state to use identity politics and the Hegelian dialectic process to diminish critical thinking and overwhelm the more enlightened alternative research that has destroyed the façade of our government being “by the people, for the people”.

Specifically, I have a great deal of concern with your devotion to Israel and close relationship with your long-time friend Benyamin Netanyahu. I feel that this relationship would diminish your objectivity in international matters and your willingness to allow for an open investigation into 9/11; an investigation called for by independent researchers who understand the connections of 9/11 with the nation of Israel. (Here is an open letter from Christopher Bollyn to you speaking directly to this matter. Here is the website “” )

Another concerning development on the Home-front is the relationship your administration seems to have with Eric Prince. Certainly this would be evidence through your selection of his sister, Betsy DeVos to oversee the Dept. of Ed; but also through your relationship with Steve Bannon who recently interviewed Prince and spoke with him about Prince’s desire to see an “Operation Phoenix” style campaign to fight against terrorism and ISIS. Much evidence has surfaced recently and in the past (such as during the Church Committee hearings) to suggest the CIA is heavily involved in national politics and media here in the United States. You seem to entertain some of these perspectives; particularly when you call out the mainstream media as being “fake news”, but your selection of head of the CIA is evidence of a concerning attitude toward accepting this relationship and cooperating with an entity that continues to operate above the law on our own soil, where we deem our sovereignty and bill of rights to be sacred.

There is much more I could go into to describe my position on why I have such a lack of trust of your presidency and administration… all based on the alternative research I have committed myself to over the last few years following Ron Paul’s second bid for the presidency. (This was my awakening into the madness of politics and deep state machinations). Though I am not optimistic that you would suggest anything that would change my position; nor am I optimistic that you would even answer me at all; I would be delighted to be reassured that you did actually have a plan to dismantle the criminal enterprises that have taken over Washington DC as my friends seem to think you do. (Perhaps your plan would be in a fashion that was a little less like what my conservative friends would like to see. I don’t think they have a good grasp on the proper relationship between humanity and their environment that is necessary for us to actually thrive. A relationship that respects local autonomy; as is being called for by the rural farming communities in Poland in response to their nation’s decision to join the EU; and doesn’t sacrifice the relationship between man and his environment for the sake of “Jobs”, “Federal Reserve Promissory notes” , “precious metals”, “peace”, “global warming” or anything governments and enterprises can come up with to subvert this relationship… pretty much the kind of relationship your selection for Secretary of Agriculture would indicate  … so, yeah… I’m still not optimistic).

If you did take the time to read this thank you and feel free to respond at

Thank You
A Concerned Citizen

Public Lands and the Roosevelt Switcheroo


I’ve been seeing much talk about the ‘State vs. Federal’ land issue lately and I thought it would be helpful to share some information that would encourage citizens to consider this issue from another angle. Contrary to most people’s inclinations (particularly when their perceptions are filtered through their left or right political leaning), they might be wise to consider that both the state and federal bureaucracies are not sincerely interested in keeping public lands truly “public” or make responsible decisions that honor the public trust they purport to serve . If you look to the history and follow the money and power dynamics you can see that the two opposing positions on this issue are being used in the same way that other “left/ right” dialectic arguments are used… to limit the conversation and guide us to a public land and access ‘solution’ that meets the objectives of those special interests that dictate to both levels of bureaucracy (LINK). Given this dynamic you have to consider that land transfers between the two entities is and has always been a theatrical ruse used to wrestle land away from the local inhabitants of those lands. Guided by perception management about land valuation and ownership through the propped up idols we’ve come to worship (like Teddy Roosevelt and Ted Turner) who put forth various phrases, rhetoric and psychobabble about “tragedy of the commons” and “manifest destinies” (both toxic rationales in my opinion), we find ourselves farther away from any true sense of connection to our land and resources than we’ve ever been. At some point you have to ask yourself, “What the fuck Chuck (Finney)?”


Why pick on Teddy?

While the Hegelian Dialectic and many other social engineering programs are used by other psychopaths of prominence, I call the process I described above, relating to public lands, the “Roosevelt Switcheroo” because so many of the modern public land and resource agencies invoke the spirit of Teddy to gain support to push their dogmatic centralizing, global-control agendas.  (Even the tribes push his bullshit, which continues to be one of the most compelling examples of Stockholm’s syndrome to be witnessed). I think it is far past time to shed some light on the Roosevelt family legacy!

For a little background on the Roosevelt family; whose bloodline extends all the way back to the Merovingian’s, I would encourage you to read this post from David Icke, the author of “The Biggest Secret” and many other enlightening books.


In italics below is an excerpt from an article about “operation Ajax” which details Kermit Roosevelt (Teddy’s grandson on the far left) contribution through his position with the CIA. Teddy Roosevelt IV is on the far right. He currently serves in the banking industry and with the Council on Foreign Relations. (A good documentary on the “New Deal” swindler in the middle is the movie “Bitter Lake” by Adam Curtis. This movie details FDR’s contribution to the birth of the Petra-dollar).


Operation Ajax, in short, was when the CIA overthrew Muhammad Mossadeq’s democratic government in 1953 and reinstalled the Shah to the throne of Iran. In 1951, a British company (AIOC) had control of Iran’s oil fields. The Iranian people believed that their deal with the AIOC was unfairly benefitting the company and a political controversy ensued. A man named Muhammad Mossadeq, a member of Iranian parliament, demanded a renegotiation of the standing agreement and the Iranian people were quick to rally behind him and make him their honored leader. The previously ineffective parliament then became the primary government in the area, leaving the Shah, who had ruled as an authoritarian monarch powerless. Since Mossadeq was backed by the majority of the people in Iran, it appeared to be Iran’s first democratically elected leader.
However, the new government only meant trouble for the United States. In 1953, there was a boycott of Iranian oil, their oil revenues decreased, and the economy declined. There were also several problems stemming from Mossadeq’s rule. He was the “driving force behind an Iranian attempt to nationalize” Britain’s oil company, the AIOC. Also, having been extremely independent, he refused to work with the requests of the United States and many became afraid that he would join forces with America’s enemy, the Soviet Union.
As a result, the CIA staged a coup d’etat in Iran, headed by President Theodore Roosevelt’s grandson, Kermit Roosevelt.”

All About the Benjamin’s!


It’s all about the Benjamin’s baby! He’s the only president anyone ever listens to. – R.S.

The most recent article to make its rounds on this issue is from the Guardian, titled Congress moves to give away national lands, discounting billions in revenue . Having not delved into the information specifically I haven’t determined to what extent I would believe what is being presented, but right off the bat I can see one of the most egregious errors in perception that highlights the deception I am speaking to is in the following excerpt:

“In addition to economic stimulus from outdoor activities, federal land creates revenue through oil and gas production, logging and other industrial uses. According to the BLM, in 2016, it made $2bn in royalty revenue from federal leases. The Outdoor Industry Association estimates federal tax revenue from the recreation economy at almost $40bn.”

When you start to build the case for federal lands on how much revenue can be generated from the exploitation of its resources then I think we are missing the point… which I continuously suggest is the point! This is part of the Hegelian Dialectic process. I, for one, think that oil and gas production is not something I want taking place on our public lands, especially here in Idaho. Whether the companies that engage in it are sold the land or given the approval by the federal or state legislatures, who are largely owned by these companies given the dynamics in Washington DC and the Idaho legislature, the reality on the ground is the same. The only difference may be the rate that the exploitation takes place and the kinds of special interests that get a spot at the feeding trough.
I don’t think managing forest for crop yield, especially to serve global markets, is a good thing and may well be creating more costs by keeping forests in a state of perpetual immaturity and imbalance that makes them more volatile and susceptible to diseases and forest fires.

I don’t even think setting aside land for tourism and recreation is a good thing. While having the positive benefit of providing for a semblance of protection, the down side is that to do so you displace the indigenous inhabitants and relinquish local control to the whims of outside entities. (Think about this assertion the next time you see a group of foreigners and city dwellers pull off their SARS masks just long enough to get a “selfie” in front of a scenic national park overlook). I would encourage people to read the book “Conservation Refugees” for more about that dynamic. I would also encourage you to read my previous blogs “Trophy Hunting and Agenda 21” and “Trickle Down Psychopathy”.

The Fix is In!


If you start out on the left and go far enough left in a circle, you end up on the right. – My friend Sara’s husband

While I do not think employees of the resource management organizations have any interest in advocating for the exploitation of public lands and the displacement of its inhabitants, there is certainly a case to be made for this being the reality. I would say this reality is a function of misperception built off of dogmatic ideologies that are reinforced through a lifetime of  operant conditioning. Consider the result of actions taken by administrators at the Point Reyes National Park that used falsified data to force the Drakes Bay Oyster Company out of business.

Video: Rep. Labrador at the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Oversight Hearing April 29, 2015

Clearly there was an agenda behind that move which, through a compromised political process and a complicit complex of misinformed environmentalists and media, this agenda (AGENDA 21) was allowed to overrule the wishes of the local community and subvert its local economy based on falsified scientific data. To date there has been no atonement for this egregious misstep. This is far from the only example.

Drakes Bay Oyster Company Comments on National Park Service Scoping Letter for Special Use Permit Environmental Impact Statement

  • Excerpt: “The oyster farm provides a number of important environmental and economic benefits to the area.1 DBOC goes to great lengths to use environmentally-friendly and sustainable culturing and harvesting techniques. For example, DBOC is the only oyster farm in California that produces and hatches most of its own seed on-site, which reduces the risk of introducing diseases or invasive species. DBOC also uses an off-bottom hanging oyster culture method that is environmentally-sustainable yet labor-intensive and, as a result, employed by less than 5% of U.S. oyster farmers. In addition to processing all its products on-site, DBOC also markets 100% of its products to Marin County and the San Francisco Bay Area in order to reduce its carbon footprint. As discussed below, in addition to the sustainable work we perform, the oysters we grow also play a critical role in the ecosystem. Together, the humans and bivalves of DBOC are working towards a sustainable way to protect and conserve Drakes Estero for future generations.
  • DBOC is also passionate about public education on issues related to conservation, the environment and the history of shellfish in the area. We provide almost daily tours at no cost to the public consistent with the RUO and SUP issued by the NPS. As the State’s last operating oyster cannery and the region’s only oyster seed-setting hatchery, DBOC has become an important educational resource. We open our farm to educational institutions of all levels, from pre-school through graduate school. The farm also supports scientific research to learn more about native oysters, estuarine biodiversity, and human health protection. The public has recognized our oyster farm’s unique value, making it a beloved and popular visitor destination.”

(How does a local small business like this, one that is working to promote ‘sustainability’, environmental responsibility and community become the target of a public trust agency that is willing to falsify scientific data to achieve their objective if not for there being colluding special interests?)

Certainly the Drakes Bay case is something to consider when you think about Trump’s administration and the federal ownership of lands; which will be directed under the command of an ex-special forces operations officer, Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, the next to head the department of the Interior. Being schooled in nonconventional warfare ( a guy who would have been an instructor at BUD/s when I was going through the program; though I don’t recall every having met him) this is a guy who would be familiar with the process of resource control as a means of exerting influence over populations. He would also understand how important it was for an invading army or organization (i.e. CIA) to maintain control and access to strategic metals and radioactive materials in order to achieve the broader ambitions of that particular entity. Zinke, who is a fan of Teddy Roosevelt, has stated his desire to keep Federal lands Federal; which interestingly detracts from most in his political camp. This makes sense given his background and the potential future ambitions of this government. (Does anyone truly think the Trump administration is interested in not exploiting public lands?)

What all this says to me is that the other side of the ‘Roosevelt Switcharoo’ is in play; much like when Gifford Pinchot’s Yale university classmate and fellow Bonseman (LINK) ( and TR’s “hand picked” successor), William Taft  took office and, as the history books suggest, allowed for industrialists to come in and wreak havoc. The end result of his presidency was that he created even more necessity for federal land acquisitions under the guise of ‘protection’. All while Teddy was conveniently off on a hunting trip to Africa, Europe and the Vatican. (Funny how Teddy always seemed to be off hunting and adventuring when the bad stuff went down; like the 1908 market crash that created the pressure to bring in the Federal Reserve bank to make sure “nothing like that ever happened again!” … well, at least until 1929, shortly before cousin Franklin came on the scene to help with the next Switcheroo). It’s the same swindle today! We even have descendants of Teddy working behind the scenes serving in the banking industry, on various boards and even on the Council of Foreign Relations; while heavily invested in philanthropic donations to “environmental” causes.
Under this paradigm (with the hindsight given through analysis of the clearing of the lands of the previous indigenous people (LINK), you can see how control and access to local resources would be much easier when it is first cleared of its inhabitants under the guise of “protection” and “preservation” as we’ve seen progress under the Antiquities and other various environmental acts. (I always encourage people from the Pacific Northwest to check out “Seeking Redress” to get a well reasoned perspective on local land issues).

Is Civilian Control of the Military in Jeopardy?”

On the Matters of Mass Indifference


“The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference. The opposite of beauty is not ugliness, it’s indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it’s indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, but indifference between life and death.” – Elie Wiesel

So much is taking place in front of and behind the scenes that is not being addressed by anyone claiming to be working for the benefit of mankind. Far too much in my opinion for us to think we are making a positive difference. Specific to the subject of public lands, consider what is now happening at the long ago set aside Selous Game Reserve in Tanzania . (This reserve is named after Teddy Roosevelt’s good friend Fredrick Selous). The Tanzania Uranium mine next to the Selous Game Reserve and World Heritage Sight is one of the projects being orchestrated by Uranium One . This company, that also has operations in Wyoming and is seeking to start operations on the Aurora mining project on BLM land in Oregon . (Note that this operation is not far south of the Malhuer wildlife refuge and the Hammond’s ranch (LINK). Could the ambitions of a government seeking to exploit very toxic and dangerous materials, such as Uranium, at the behest of a foreign mining company, one that is even partly owned by Russia, be part of the reason for the pressure to get rid of ranchers in south east Oregon or other areas and set aside these areas under the Antiquities Act? (Like Gold Butte in Nevada)

Lastly, consider the science that is being used to inform decisions on public lands. (LINK). (Like that used to evict Drakes Bay Oyster Company). This science doesn’t appear to be doing the job of fully informing resource managers or considering a broad range of perspectives. It seems to be well understood by most that the scientific process is being heavily influenced by special interest at the level of the universities and within the resource management organizations. (Not only by “Big Oil” and energy companies and “Big Pharma” but also by a host of garden variety philanthropists and globalists like Bill Gates and George Soros; by foundations such as the Carnegie Foundation; Rockefeller Foundation; all the various Big NGO’s (BINGO’s) and many government agencies like DARPA, the Atomic Energy Agencies, the CIA and so many others!) Because of this onslaught of special interest monies and perception management, I think those working in the resource management fields are under a great deal of influence that minimizes their critical thinking processes and puts them under a great deal of pressure to remain silent when confronted with information that doesn’t support the goals and objectives of their organization. With the situation as it is; these are the goals and objectives that get filtered down through the public trust agencies. More often than not these are being dictated to them by administrators whose own special interests often leave them compromised. Certainly not a reflection of the “will of the people”! (The ‘people’ instead get their opinions given to them through various processes of social engineering).

It’s a process that continues to leave a compassionate public servant, who is well researched beyond the confines of the established narratives, feeling sick to the stomach as they dance around policy decisions and directives that they know are ill-conceived and politically motivated; right down to the science that is put forth to support it. Regardless of the empirical or scientific evidence being considered that might suggest agencies actions are ill advised or in opposition to public interest, employees of these agencies are not encouraged or given an opportunity to voice their concerns. (Consider the Weather Modification Programs that are taking place all over the western states and the world… or the numerous pesticide spraying programs that continue on public lands; even though clear evidence can be seen of how much these toxins have harmed the environment and should invoke much stricter adherence to precautionary principles… try promoting things like that from within an institution and you will quickly be shunned, ignored and otherwise marginalized).



Here are a couple efforts I would encourage people to check out that I’ve found to be making a responsible and effective approach to change the dynamics of this toxic paradigm. The first link is to the “East Run Hellbender Society” out of Grant Township Pennsylvania.

The second link is to the “People’s Republic of Kanata

This is a link to Julian Rose’s “Proximity Principle” which speaks to agriculture but could just as easily apply to all forms of land use.

‘Dam’aged Goods


Pakistan Concerned Over Plan to Build Dams on the Kabul River


I have been developing a theory about an issue that is currently coming back into the spotlight here in the Pacific Northwest having to do with the hydro-electric dams along the Columbia River and its many tributaries. The New York Times Editorial, “The Salmon’s Swim for Survival” By THE EDITORIAL BOARD JULY 4, 2016 provides the launching point for which to set the stage of this theory. The opening paragraphs, which lay the foundation for the rest of that article, provides the foundation for my argument; an argument which  refutes these opening statements and provides other insights to suggest that there is way more going on here. Below is an excerpt from this article of those assertions that I argue are fundamentally incorrect:

  • “There are two recent pieces of welcome news affecting the Pacific Northwest’s beleaguered salmon populations — battered by dams, habitat loss, timid government agencies and global warming.
    In one, a federal court in Seattle found that 150-year-old treaties guaranteeing Native American tribes a permanent right to fish for salmon had been gravely compromised by hundreds of roadway culverts and pipelines that blocked the fish from reaching traditional spawning grounds.
    The other hopeful sign was a stirring decision in May by Judge Michael Simon of the Federal District Court in Portland, Ore., ordering federal agencies back to the drawing board to devise an aggressive plan to stave off extinction for 13 salmon and steelhead species in the Columbia River basin that are listed as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act. He found the government’s latest proposal not only inadequate but illegal, in that it fell well short of the act’s mandate to ensure a species’ long-term recovery.
    The original treaties did not envision “such a cynical and disingenuous promise,” Judge William Fletcher, of the federal appeals court for the Ninth Circuit, ruled last week. He upheld a lower court’s order requiring Washington State to replace hundreds of culverts with bridges that restore the natural flow of the salmon runs.”

The statement above, particularly that which is highlighted in bold, when compared to historical evidence can be thoroughly refuted and the Judge, William Fletcher, considered to be (at best!) naïve about his understanding of the treaty making process. We can come to this conclusion simply by researching the numerous examples in history that highlight the reality of such disingenuous promises.

Of course this kind of nonsensical perspective is par for the course when it comes to Judges of the Ninth Circuit (as we witnessed recently in the case of the Hammonds in Oregon). With Fletcher himself, coming from a long lineage of high profile judges; including his mother and perhaps others  in his lineage being Federal judges and Rhodes scholars   (here’s another) (himself being a Rhodes Scholar with Bill Clinton); as well as potentially coming from a very influential family in terms of international influence; (the genealogy gets very convoluted so it’s difficult to make a clear connection to the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy). Given just the limited connections here, it is virtually impossible that Fletcher doesn’t know the Hegelian dialectic process and the utility of directing a “synthesis” from dialectically opposing viewpoints or how the overall subjugation process can be made to manifest in indigenous and rural communities through the treaty making process.


Water Control and Conflict Theory

My theory, based on the growing awareness of state-craft in the form of propaganda, false flags, subversive thought control processes and dialectic drivers, is that the entire paradigm with which the argument, for and against the Columbia dams, exists within is fundamentally compromised by the lack of overall awareness of the initial primary and contemporary drivers for the development of watersheds worldwide. This includes the large dams and hydrological infrastructures that have been built to facilitate the goals of the projects here in the United States but also those in other nations; especially those projects that cross boarders (which is also true of the Columbia drainage). I suggest this lack of awareness about the larger forces at work, through well connected and influential individuals and institutions; including those that have operated in the past and continue to perpetuate false and incomplete information today, operate in ways that continue to subjugated indigenous communities and to functionally ensure that nothing of substance threatens their vested interests. This would not just include their monetary interests but also the deep state ambitions for command and control over all human endeavors. (I recognize this is sensational to consider, but the evidence to support this observation is compelling.)

What I suggest is that the construction of the dams along the Columbia, Snake and other tributaries within the Columbia drainage, were implemented primarily in accordance with national and international processes with the primary goal of disrupting indigenous communities as well as the emerging settlements that were made to manifest in the interest of ‘nation building’. The desired result for those operating in the background would be to force everyone living along these waterways into a dependency upon government and private institutions (or their chimeric regulatory bodies such as the BPA, LSRCP, Pacific States, etc). I suggest this would have been at the behest of the same influential families (LINK) along with the various governments and private institutions that benefitted from the control paradigms this afforded them through the creation of public tax and utility use funded organizations that could dictate to the local policy makers and community leaders. Effectively, these large hydro projects disconnect every adjacent river community from the direct relationship to their rivers, along with the resources it provides, and puts it into an agency control paradigm that depends on the good faith of a government and industry ‘control board’ (which is essentially beholden to its investors) to serve the public trust.

As Usual, The Devil is in the Details

When you look at polices that too often has run counter to ‘biological opinion’ in the United States of America, how much it has mirrored developments around the world and how extensively many of these developments have had to depended on international investments and co-operation to manifest (Bank of international Settlements (BIA) we have to ask how well this paradigm is serving the public that has allowed for its implementation. Given the loss of control over the resources on which communities depend, you have to wonder just what the push really is. Like so many modern developments (now with the extremely large investments of public monies into far-reaching (LINK SURVEYLANCE) and toxic (EMF, NUCLEAR) technological developments that support the international power/ surveillance grid (LINK WASHINGTON’s BLOG), I suggest these developments are not truly representative of the will of the public; but the will of institutions and a public who has been conditioned and coerced into relinquishing control and responsibility to these outside entities. It’s too often the case that the public is incapable of making an informed decision or effectively pose a counter position, as the true cost and benefits of these implemented polices and technologies are far from being well understood by the vast majority of the people in the affected communities. Any revelation that truly exposes how the technological ‘progress’ might promote harm to health, the environment or sovereignty it becomes marginalized or co-opted into something less threatening to the power structure. (LINK) It’s become a paradigm that encourages ignorance and apathy. When you look to the numerous connections within the world of international finance, corporations and public trust agencies, along with the control paradigms that rule over all of the information sources that build people’s perceptions; it is possible to recognize numerous inconsistencies in action and rhetoric that would lead one to the same or similar hypothesis as mine. (SAD STATE OF SCIENCE)

Questions for DAMSENSE:

Having attended one of the DAMSENSE presentations concerning the breaching of the 4 lower snake river dams and meeting the knowledgeable and dedicated proponents of this cause, I was encouraged to see some awareness being put forth about the issue of public trust (or lack of) having to do with the Army Corp of Engineers, politicians, the judiciary and other agencies regarding the ineffective and unnecessary court battles being fought over this issue (LINK). Having dedicated a great deal of my personal life to challenging my thinking on many issues; much of them having to do with public trustees and public trust institutions; and putting forth information to challenge others on their perceptions, I find any effort to expose this public misperception to be a good thing. The concern I levy with this dam removal effort, along with so many other noble efforts, has to do with the limited extent to which they go into the deeper revelations about public trust concerns and those who abuse it. I also take issue with some of the promoted solutions to the problems associated with hydropower and other water control and distribution projects by Damsense and other advocacy organizations because they build upon data and research that is often times fundamentally compromised. Here are a few questions that need to be clarified

Are you properly considering the human rights case?

My first question to this effort would be to ask if they have approached the dam issue from a REAL human rights perspective and analyzed the extremely deep institutional collusion that has taken place and continues to take place to advance these large hydropower projects. (Such as has been explored through other researchers like those associated with Cultural Survival) Because the dam removal proponents bring the tribes and their perspective on the dam removal issue to the table, it would suggest they have considered the human rights aspect of these dams. Given the dynamics of tribal politics, which I would suggest are every bit as compromised as any other political entity, you have to question the deeper implications of such an approach.

The fact that the arguments levied to support dam breaching tend to be based on economic valuations (ones that advance other large scale “green” power projects that have their own set of consequences and do nothing to reduce our collective dependency on a national power grid  suggest to me that the fundamental issue of human rights aren’t being properly addressed. The limited exposure of the current situation that promotes the public-private partnerships that tend to diminish local sovereignty, suggests this as well. Petitioning public trustees to “do the right thing” in a system that was born from and exists off this dynamic that fundamentally encourages us to do ‘the wrong thing’ rather than calling on these politicians to be held accountable for their actions, is what I would see as lacking in their efforts.

Has anyone looked into the deeper connections to central banking and international investments in hydro-infrastructures?

Having researched some of the early acts and their proponents and recognizing how these acts have enabled large scale hydro-projects to move forward (LINK International Irrigation Congress) it appears to me that we have an illusion of oversight by our ambitious public trustees and the agencies they direct. I have written a great deal about this in previous blog posts (PUBLIC DISTRUST). Every agency preaches the gospel about ‘public trust’; so it’s been a disturbing revelation for me to recognize the extent to which these institutions run counter to this stated ideology. It’s been my experience, having brought issues of concern to the fore, that there isn’t a responsible mechanism for public trust issues to be considered within any institution of public trust (including the tribes). One need only look to the “Columbia River Accords” (LINK) (something I was not aware of until it was brought to my attention at the Damsense presentation) to see how all entities and their public trust can be co-opted and compromised.

Have the proponents of dam removal done enough to consider the implications for communities and families who have come to depend on the dams for their livelihoods?

I named this sight “modern indigenous perspectives” for a reason; to provide that much overlooked perspective that can only be understood from those who live in these rural areas. While I draw much of my perspectives from the tragedy that befell the American Indians, I don’t identify with only their plight. Those of us who don’t share that particular assault with our ancestry (at least not in the last 300 years) are living here amongst the previous indigenous peoples who did and I would say most of us living out here would like to do so peacefully and respectfully; including the tribes. As neighbors, the modern indigenous peoples are depending on the same resources as the original inhabitants. Unfortunately this dependency has developed in ways that run a gambit of enabling paradigms that serve outside interests; interests that allow these internationally connected and well-financed institutions to dictate the relationships within these communities. It’s resulted in a dynamic that is ungrounded and unhealthy; be it government institution inspired (BIA & resource management agencies) or international industry inspired (energy industry, forest industry, agriculture industry, mining industry, technocracy, etc…). Absent these prevailing interests, which includes the hydropower complex, I suspect everyone would learn to get along reasonably well and a local economy in an area so rich in resources, would thrive. This doesn’t seem to be the push, nor is their enough concern being levied toward the effected families.

I’ve seen the economic argument for and against removal of the dams but I haven’t seen anything speaking directly to the families and communities who will be directly affected. Yes, there certainly is a huge and costly infrastructure and wasteful bureaucracy around these dams. However, there are many good people and communities dependent on those dams. Those many dedicated people and their families, in the event of a dam removal, will have their lives uprooted and I don’t see all these employees and their families being absorbed into the recreation industry that is being anticipated.

When I consider the dynamic institutions and infrastructures that make up the modern power grid, including the Dams, I am reminded of what it must have been like for the American Indian when the crown colonies established communities around the trapping industry, including the tribes that had become subjugated to those original crown companies. (LINK) When the wholesale slaughter of those animals to provide for an international market in these resources went away (or shifted it’s product line rather), tribes were impoverished . This lead to a 200+ years of dealing with “the Indian problem”; a problem that manifested into some very dark efforts at eradication built around the ideology of wanting to “save the man and kill the savage”. (LINK)

“This continent had to be won. We need not waste our time in dealing with any sentimentalist who believes that, on account of any abstract principle, it would have been right to leave this continent to the domain, the hunting ground of squalid savages. It had to be taken by the white race.” – Teddy Roosevelt “Friend of the Indian” (With friends like Teddy, who needs enemies?)

I’ve written extensively on this sight about the process of subjugation I call the “Roosevelt Switcheroo” (LINK). If what I’ve presented above in this post has any merit, I would say this hydro-infrastructure that exists along the Columbia River drainage is another manifestation of this same bait and switch on the path of subjugation. If deemed such (as would be the case when we look to the relationships between governments and industry that have driven this paradigm) it would have huge implications for how reparations are administered. To this end, I would encourage a dam removal solution strategy to analyze how the costs of dam removal and the affected families be provided for through the very well positioned banking families (LINK) as they have prospered immensely while having passed the responsibility for dealing with these devolving situations on to the citizenry. Why not defer the costs of dam removal to Teddy Roosevelt the IV and V (LINK)? If anyone has received ill-gotten gains from the treatment of the Indians and the settlers as pawns in the process, it is that sadistic lineage. (Perhaps sticking them with the bill will reduce their capacity to co-opt legitimate grass roots efforts to deal with local issues by way of the vast NGO industrial complex (LINK) or contribute to the numerous and costly wars of conquest being developed through “think tanks” organizations such as the CFR (LINK)).

Another Way

4- Decentralize the Grid:
This blog post from “Washington’s Blog” challenges the notion that a centralized power grid is more efficient, reliable and safer and suggests that decentralizing the grid is the best way to achieve better security and reduce environmental concerns.

This leaves me to wonder if the remaining infrastructure after a dam breach is capable of being utilized to generate power on a small scale for the communities near the structure. Perhaps they can be modified as penstocks or retrofitted with some kind of run of the river system? This might provide opportunity for the employees at these dams to maintain their livelihoods under a smaller, community connected utility.
Small-hydro Projects:
In River Turbines:

Useful Links and Other Similar Case Studies

Here are some links and commentary that brings to light some of the history and contemporary issues that the proponents and opponents of dam breaching might find interesting and useful. Perhaps this deeper perspective might encourage us all to consider other avenues of approach; approaches that might lead to empowering resolutions as well as restitutions for the clear human rights violations. Perhaps, with this well supported alternative understanding of the situation, the restitutions might be levied on the appropriate offenders; which would be those who, by way of subversion, continue to thrive under this current paradigm. Perhaps, through greater awareness, we might find ways to disallow these offenders the opportunity to continue placing restitutions on the descendants of the initially affected citizens, indigenous and settler alike, who continue to be those that suffer from this collective Stockholm’s syndrome. (STOCKHOLM SYNDROME)

1- National and International Irrigation Congress:
Wolfenbarger, Anderw G.

2- Cultural Survival:
This article from Cultural Survival, speaks to the collaborations and investments in hydro-electric projects around the world from International NGO and United Nations organizations and International banking institutions. This would suggest that there is an on-going and well-funded agenda behind large hydro projects that extends beyond borders. As Mark Dowie’s book “Conservation Refugees” details (perhaps inadvertently), there may well have been such an agenda taking place for a very long time. Perhaps it’s a process of subjugation in the interest of globalization that goes all the way back to the Roman Empire and the Crusades… (would not the Papal Bulls issued under the Doctrines of Discover, Manifest Destiny, and more modern examples such as the Anti-Communist Manifesto be evidence of such an agenda?)

3- Shasta Dam Raise: Winnimum Wintu:
This is a contemporary example from California that demonstrates how institutional collusion, in their efforts to deal with the California droughts, is leading to human rights violations. These ‘fixes’ to what I would consider a largely manufacture crisis (due to prior and contemporary technological “advancements” (LINK HYDRO PROJECTS IN CA) (GEOENGINEERING) are leading to the further marginalization of a group of people who essentially have no platform to assert their human rights from, because they are not “recognized” by the federal government (they haven’t been “incorporated” under the institutional authority of the BIA).

4- Decentralize the Grid:
This blog post from “Washington’s Blog” challenges the notion that a centralized power grid is more efficient, reliable and safer and suggests that decentralizing the grid is the best way to achieve better security and reduce environmental concerns.
This leaves me to wonder if the remaining infrastructure that remains after a dam breach is capable of being utilized to generate power on a small scale for the communities near the structure. Perhaps they can be modified as penstocks or retrofitted with some kind of run of the river system? This might provide opportunity for the employees at these dams to maintain their livelihoods under a smaller, community connected utility that wouldn’t have the capacity to force policy and infrastructure changes through collusion or political pressures.
Small-hydro Projects:
In River Turbines:

5- Afghan Valley Authority:

“If you look beyond the soldiers, and into the distance, what you are really seeing are the ruins of one of the biggest technological projects the United States has ever undertaken. Its aim was to use science to try and change the course of history and produce a modern utopia in Afghanistan. The city of Lashkar Gah was built by the Americans as a model planned city, and the hundreds of miles of canals that the Taliban now hide in were constructed by the same company that built the San Francisco Bay Bridge and Cape Canaveral.”

This is a very interesting article by Adam Curtis detailing the lost history of Helmand Province and the Morrison Knutson hydropower projects that were financed by the US following the TVA and Columbia river projects.

This example demonstrates well the ambitions of a well-connected intelligence community with an ideology that goes well beyond what most people have been taught in school or what they are willing to consider. It’s extremely interesting and telling how intelligence community policies have been used as the fundamental basis for high level decision making in national and international endeavors. This lost history challenges our ideas of “democracy” and ties into the narrative of the modern Afghan war, into the history of international finance and currency manipulation (with the birth of the Petra-dollar*) and even into the astronomically expensive War on Drugs*. If you can understand the underlying push for such a project that followed “Modernization Theories” that would bring about such long lasting and devastating consequences it shouldn’t be much of a stretch to think there were similar ambitions with FDR and others here in the US at the time of the “New Deal” and the TVA. (LINK)

“Faced with this the engineers’ doubts about the project were buried and forgotten. Massive loans poured in from America and two giant dams were built plus 300 miles of big canals.
But more problems emerged. Everything became waterlogged which led to weeds. Salt kept on suddenly appearing. And the reservoirs and the canals made the water cooler which meant that there couldn’t be any vineyards and orchards any longer. In future they could only grow grain.
But again all the doubts and worries were overwhelmed because the American technocrats and politicians had become fascinated by a new idea. It was called “Modernization Theory”. It said that there was a way of using science and technology not just to stop countries like Afghanistan going communist, but to actually transform them into democratic capitalist societies like America.
Modernization Theory had been invented by an ambitious academic at Harvard called Walt Whitman Rostow. He said that if you put the right technologies in place and educated key elites then the countries would inevitably develop into advanced capitalist societies. They would go through a series of logical stages (there were five) until you got what he modestly called “Rostovian Lift-off”.
Some of the individuals who were key players in this development were Truman, Walt Whitman Rostow and Saudi Prince, ……….,
• Walt Whitman Rostow
Walt Whitman Rostow (also known as Walt Rostow or W.W. Rostow) OBE (October 7, 1916 – February 13, 2003) was a United States economist and political theorist who served as Special Assistant for National Security Affairs to U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1966–69.
Prominent for his role in the shaping of US foreign policy in Southeast Asia during the 1960s, he was a staunch anti-communist, noted for a belief in the efficacy of capitalism and free enterprise, strongly supporting US involvement in the Vietnam War. Rostow is known for his book The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (1960), which was used in several fields of social science.”
6- Tragedy & Hope:

7- Executive Orders:

I question the wisdom of pleading a case for dam removal through various politicians and by executive order. I see this as further establishing credibility for a system that legitimizes the practice of subjecting human rights to the whims of politicians and other personalities. If you are truly paying attention you will see human rights being superseded worldwide in this way almost on a daily basis by public trust officials (LINK). I suggest this is not being recognized because of the well-established social programming mechanisms (in schools and media) that are diminishing people’s understanding of this very fundamental issue.
Another blogger at “Seeking Redress” has some interesting perspectives that are similar to my own on this issue as it relates to the national call for ‘protection’ of the Owyhee Canyonlands by Executive order.
I would have a concern, too, that removal of these dams might not achieve favorable results; or the results that were achieved may well be so convoluted and politicized that the only result would be to further solidify dialectic opinions on both sides. (Parr for the course when it comes to the Hegelian Dialectic process (LINK) that drives every significant issue). I’ve pointed out in previous posts how much science has been politicized and compromised through its adherence to various special interest funding sources. (SAD STATE OF SCIENCE)
Science is bullshit (Drakes Bay Oyster Company) (Baker’s Green Acre Farms) (Malheur)(
The only way around this may be to approach this from a human rights perspective under common law jurisdiction. (Like ITCCS).

Pacific States and the New Age “Rustovian Lift-off”
Water History:

2000 article on dam breaching:
1994 Settlement over Colville Dam:
International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID):
National Irrigation Congress:

Trickle-Down Psychopathy In America


The reason I started this blog, I am starting to realize, was more for my own sanity than anything else. Ideally I would like my blog posts to help others get a perspective on things and encourage them to step into their responsibility in the process of transcending our current situation. That is the tone I get from my inner voice as I scribe here and continues to be the message I hope to convey in my blogs. Maybe this is a cowardly approach. In reality I am still functionally tied into the system, as well as some of the programming and institutions that makes me complicit in the madness. I feel strongly that I have yet to step into my own responsibility as a conscious human being.

Personality wise, I would say I am not someone who is inclined to speak up; I don’t have an ego that compels me to assert myself or my views, nor do I have the desire to win in a debate. I try to avoid conflicts and contentious situations and I don’t like to hurt people’s feelings, bring them stress or challenge their world views. (Certainly many examples of my behavior would suggest otherwise, though I would attribute those realities to the larger forces at play that limit our ability to express or thoughts and perspectives in a healthy and open way; which includes sometimes projecting my own angst). At any rate, on the face of it, I am the last person anyone would expect to bring forth challenging information and call people out on their views and opinions. I am just too nice of a person.

  • Personal Story Interjection– Thinking about my personality reminds me of a story from my youth about a bus ride down to the Idaho State football championships during my freshman (maybe sophomore?) year of high school. On that trip south, those of us who were underclassmen had to ride down on the same bus as the cheerleaders. On our first pit-stop of that journey I purchased a couple cans of smoked oysters which, upon consumption, developed into a deluge of flatus that practically baked the occupants of that bus, including the cheerleaders and their advisor. As soon as we arrived to our destination, the cheerleading advisor was quick to tell the head coach about the ‘terrible awful’ I had done. Because I shared a first name with someone else on the bus (apparently someone with a less than stellar reputation) it was the other “Chuck” (pseudo name) who got the tongue-lashing from the coach. I was such a ‘nice boy’ that the advisor would never have suspected I could do such a thing! That was probably nearing the height of my immaturity and, while I think farts are still funny, I can see why my mother told me it can be offensive.

Whatever my reasoning for this blog and the reality of my progress, or lack of, toward taking full responsibility to act against an encroaching tyranny, I am quite confident that my perceptions are right when I suggest the world is becoming a very strange and unacceptable place. I think this is true not only to me but to anyone who has any consciousness above the Kardasian level. If we are to get beyond this state of affairs I think we have to AT LEAST start talking consciously about some of the deeper concerning issues.

Deafening Silence

“If you want the world to add up in its current state of madness, you first have to divide by the common denominator.” (Why the Trump vs Clinton Election is a Complete Sham)


It’s increasingly becoming the case that all the things we are conditioned to NOT talk about are ruling our lives, forsaking us to the ridiculous things we do get to talk about. (LINK) While news media can be entertaining on a “Keeping up with the Kardashians” level, it becomes toxic to the status quo when everyone chooses to build their worldviews based on the blatantly ridiculous spin they see in the media. I don’t think people are actually buying much of it anymore, at least not in the tradition numbers, which is a good thing. However, because too many of us refuse to talk about it and lay the madness to waste under sound logic and moral principles, we continue down the tracks on this crazy train toward the impending madness that awaits us (taking the form of two versions of Hell; one of outright Orwellian dystopia and the other a gentrified, Huxulian bourgeoisie ( Mind control: Orwell, Huxley, and today’s reality). The world under this paradigm is drowning as we are picking fights over superficial manufactured issues and fighting over political cartoon characters while avoiding the more relevant issues of concern to our human condition. When it makes sense to push back against blatant tyranny we are choosing to “go along to get along” rather than consciously considering ALL the information before us and acting responsibly. However we justify our actions and inactions in the paradigm, by not getting an understanding of the deeper aspects of our condition, we are risking the reality that we seal our own fate. While this “go along to get along” mentality that keeps us away from the darker and more concerning issues, might be functional and sometimes necessary to maintain healthy relationship and sanity, this mentality is becoming the guiding force that is directing all our lives. (The politically aligned exploitation of children through abuse and trafficking is at the top in terms of what is most concerning in my opinion; as detailed in these documentaries, “CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE” and “UNREPENTENT”)This is particularly and insidiously true of the institutions of news media and reporting (the Fourth Estate), education and, most importantly, within the institutions of public trust; where public trustees and their serving public trust managers maintain the capacity to direct the lives of the average citizen, dictate these citizen’s relationships with each other and their resources, while refusing to address or acknowledge any of the fundamentally flawed research or the consequences of their policies, technologies and worldviews. It is from the realization about the capacity of entrusted public servants to enforce policy, which profoundly effects the average citizen, that I focus on that demographic in my blog posts. Politicians and higher level public trust agents are far too corruptible to act responsibly in my opinion but most serving in the institutions of public trust, absent state coercion and social programming, would act responsibly.

I’ve directly witnessed how those in the institutions of public trust, who do have the courage to break from their conditioning and speak their mind, are punished for their actions to speak out (LINK). Conversely, if what they are saying has some value to the overall agenda to centralize control in some capacity, they are rewarded (LINK). Maintain the façade which governs our lives and you’ll be successful. You’ll move up in social status and be bestowed with monetary incentives and rank. Do otherwise and you’ll be marginalized, penalized, or outright removed. It’s become the case that public servants of conscience have nowhere to turn in the end, as any semblance of ‘whistleblower protections’ from within the system are simply a façade; as the tradition “human resource” and other departments that preach “responsible government” are themselves victim to perception controls that dictate what action or inactions will best serve the organization and its overall agenda. (CIA AGENT SPEAKS OUT ABOUT GEOENGIONEERING )

Bread & Circuses and the Trickle Down Psychopath

“Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.” – Donald Trump “Grab Them By the Pussy” Song

“When society rots, it rots from the top down.”

So many examples to draw from that demonstrate the insane mindset among the average citizen these days. When it is the case that average citizens talk about the things they read in the newspaper or see on TV, it is seldom the case that they question the validity or entertain outside perspectives. It seems to be the reality for most who are on the path of discovery that there are few places to turn for decent conversation; conversation where there isn’t some toxic overriding perception controlling otherwise open discourse and rational thinking. This has become the norm in society and nowhere is it operating more insidiously than in the institutions of public trust. I’ve written to this in many of my previous blogs (essentially the primary focus of my site). Unfortunately I have yet to see anything change. Two current examples from the field of resource management and war propaganda have my attention.

The Trickle Down Psychopathic ‘Killing/ Conservation’ Mindset


I recently read an article in the Lewiston Tribune where the author, Eric Barker, like Rocky Barker (related?), was writing about African hunting and it’s contribution to African wildlife conservation. This article was similar to the Rocky Barker article about Cecil the Lion, which I had analyzed in a previous blog post (Wildlife Management and Agenda 21 ). In this latest article, “In Africa, Conservation and Hunting Go Hand In Hand”, Eric Barker interviews an IDFG officer about the time he spent hunting and tagging along with game wardens in ….., Africa. While much of the views shared by the IDFG game officer in this article might come from a place of good intension and, in some ways, properly spells out a harsh reality about the conditions people and wildlife face in Africa; I would argue that these views come from a place of limited perception that is concerning. This perspective about Africa and wildlife conservation leaves out some very fundamental issues that contribute to a toxic ideology that would lead him and others, like Rocky & Eric Barker, to manifest a dangerous world view.

In the opening line of this article the article states; “(Officer’s name) was uneasy as he witnessed game scouts use wire to lash a poacher to a chair and then beat the man for information.” Later in the article the officer goes on to say he “was grateful that we have a Bill of Rights in this country” and referred to what he witnessed as “frontier justice”. I find this officer’s inaction in that situation and his lack of true condemnation about what took place to be extremely concerning. This mindset is a fine example of what I call “trickle down psychopathy”. A true public servant would recognize that the act this officer witnessed and failed to fully condemn was an international crime in most countries… though, oddly enough given his statement concerning the US Bill of Rights protections, perhaps not in the US as I understand they did not sign the universal human rights declaration of 1948; or, if we did, we’ve since modified it through the NDAA so as not to apply to “stateless enemy combatants” or loosely defined “terrorist suspects”. (International Human Rights Law) Even if it were the case that US and African public trust agents were somehow exempt from international human rights laws , a true public servant would not recommend we contribute our time and money to any organization or institution that is in CLEAR VIOLATION of these basic human rights. The fact that the reporter, Eric Barker, does not address this truth and that nobody has publicly presented this concern suggests to me that we have a very significant flaw in our collective consciousness. It is concerning that we can’t see it is wrong to allow extra-judicial beatings to be committed by institutions regardless of their nationality (isn’t that what they tell us “spreading democracy” is all about?). If this mindset is left unchecked, this will most definitely become the norm here in America as our “Bill of Rights” protections will become more and more limited; even more than it already has under the NDAA!  As it stands now, a case can be made that the Bill of Rights protections in this nation are being circumvented left right and center. You can see this when you look to the evidence; such as in the handling of the occupation of the Malheur Wildlife Refuge, the treatment of the Hammonds prior to this occupation (LINK) and the subsequent over reactionary assault and killing of Lavoy Finnicum. (This situation and on-going court case is one of those issues that public trust agencies have been conditioned NOT to talk about!) (MALHEUR OCCUPATION)

As you see the “State vs. Federal” control of the land dialectic (LINK) play out and the lands start to become more and more off-limits by way of private investments or government protections, prepare to see similar abuses to the land and locals, similar to that in Africa; as the international trade in “off-limit” resources becomes more valuable per unit and the local communities become marginalized and displaced. (Probably will not be as evident here as in Africa or in 1800’s & 1900’s America, as we’ve gone down this road to a large degree already with the subjugation of the American Indians; as well as for the fact that few, aside from a few hunting and tourism services guides, is proximally subsisting off these lands and resources. I would suggest we’ve already essentially been ‘reduced to possession’).

In this same article the IDFG Conservation Officer states having an interest in African history. If this officer were a true history buff he would know that both African and American histories are rife with examples of how this same mindset was able to pervade the ranks of soldiers and local law enforcement in order to advance local displacement and subjugation agendas (Doctrine of Discovery and Manifest Destiny (LINK); Non-Communist Manifesto (LINK); Just War Theory (LINK); Non-Communist Manifesto (LINK); Belfour Declaration (LINK); etc). Speaking of African history, I am curious about just how many of these kinds of exceptionalism ideologies where created or supported by Rhodes Scholars (LINK)? A HUGE study in African history and modern day imperialism, which persists even greater now on the world stage, can be gained in the study of Cecil Rhodes!) A complicit protection class is what allows for the suffrages inflicted upon populations; suffrages that would never have been possible otherwise. It was a complicit protection class that has cleared the way for the displacement of indigenous people in these hunting preserves in the name of resource exploitation AND in the name of resource protection (actually exploitation of the conditions first made to manifest through resource exploitation. This is the process I call the “Roosevelt Switcheroo” (LINK)).

I would encourage the officer in the Lewiston Tribune article to read the book “Conservation Refugees” by Mark Dowie. In this book he will find evidence of how the indigenous people, whose ability to defend against a global investment in their eradication, were undermined by those serving in the public’s trust, like the game managers he witnessed tie up and beat a man, who, at one time, might have been able to resist the imposition on their way of life rather than serve in the exploitation of a resource for the enjoyment of international sportsmen; all for the sake of a few scraps of meat. (I’m sorry but this isn’t “living”, this is servitude!) Extrapolate that situation and consider how this mindset is not being challenged by ANYONE in the public trust agencies and you might consider that there is a push for displacement and marginalization of indigenous peoples (both modern and traditional)here in America every bit as much as it is in Africa. The subjugation process is alive and well to this day and it doesn’t care what your nationality is.

The Trickle Down Psychopathic Military Mindset


Having listened to Jocko Willink’s podcast with Sam Harris and understanding that he would have the same access to all the information I have, I wonder if it would ever be in his interest to be interviewed by someone like James Corbett or Sibel Edmonds or Jay Dyer or Patrick Hennessey or converse with Ken Okeefe? Much like Joe Rogan and others in the ‘alternative’ media, Sam Harris seems to be another mouthpiece among the cadre of “New Age” personalities that I would consider to be functioning as gatekeepers to an awakening humanity.

  • Sam Harris’ Wikipedia page: “Harris is considered a member of the “Four Horsemen of New Atheism,” alongside Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and the late Christopher Hitchens.” (Like the 4 horsemen of the apocalypse?)

Rather than speaking with mainstream alternative mouthpieces and pseudo intellectuals that stay within the confines of a well-managed “pacifist” vs. “realist” dialectic (Hegelian Dialectic, which, in this case would be the “Just War Theory” ) these investigative journalists I mentioned, challenge the level of thinking that Jocko speaks to in that interview with Sam Harris and make a very strong case for there being another level to this paradigm. Rather than following the official school book narratives, the researchers I mentioned above, are taking into consideration many other revelatory sources of information; such as extensive literary works like Tragedy and Hope by Carrol Quigley  , The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinskii, and others. They also take the time to consider the revelations about social engineering through what we know about CIA operations such as Operation Gladio and Operation Ajax; the convoluted US relationship which lead to the rise of Sadam and our backing of their war against Iran; along with so many other relevant histories that challenge the promoted narratives. These revelations identify the limitations of the politically naïve concept of “blowback” (the concept that Jocko,and the pseudo-intellectuals he speaks with, promote as the “opposing viewpoint” to genuine war hawks). The work of these little known researchers, demonstrate that there are certain internationally sponsored elements within national and global institutions working to destabilize regions. They appear to be doing this by using all means at their disposal; such as false flag terrorism, resource control and exploitation, controlling a country’s means of production and employing various forms of propaganda and culture creation as well as their fracturing and disenfranchisement (NGO INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX). They make a strong case for there being an underlying agenda, an agenda that may well be much more ambitious than most people realize and absolutely dependent upon guys like Jocko, who have a significant platform to speak from, not questioning the “official narratives”; even though the same kinds of operations can be seen quite clearly in the US every time you turn on your TELL-LIE-VISION and recognize that it is absolutely rife with bullshit (clearly weaponized media).
I think if he were to speak directly with some of these probing reporters and analyze their research we might all come away with a different perspective. We might get closer to the realization that the darkest of the “bad guys” might not be the ones we are facing on the battlefield but, rather, the ones who sign our military paychecks and secure a steady stream of funding for those we are fighting against by fleecing the well-conditioned masses; all the while using some of these funds and black budgets to covertly create the conditions for “low intensity conflicts in high per-diem areas”.
My concern, which in the interview Jocko seem to recognize when he talks about how “the average Iraqi citizen is just trying to live their lives” while the news media portrays the situation in Iraq as otherwise, is that despite what this implies about the state of our mainstream media, he is not investigating the information that challenges these narratives. (Why would an independent media engage in this type of spin? The answer should be obvious). Since Jocko seems to have a popular platform to share his thoughts and perspectives, I am concerned that his avoidance or otherwise diminishing of the information that demonstrates high level collusion by our politicians and military strategists, which leaves his readers and listeners ignorant and mentally unprepared to act appropriately to the “strategy of tensions” (STRATEGY OF TENSION) being foisted on them here at home; through manufactured crisis creation and destabilizing social programming mechanisms. (The same kinds of mechanisms used to create crisis in other countries like Chechnya, the Ukraine, Syria, Bosnia and so many others). Newsbud- Media Lies:
A few fundamental issues being ignored that need to be reconciled for you and others to maintain your positions:
1) Congressional Inquiries concerning the War Powers Act-
2) General Wesley Clark and the “7 Wars Plan” speech:
3) The numerous inconsistencies with the “official version” of 9/11: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth- Firefighters For 9/11 Truth- Christopher Bollyn- Incontrovertible –
4) The Pat Tillman Issue:
5) The whole issue with the exponential rise in private security companies like Blackwater, and their convoluted missions we keep hearing about. What do you make of the death of Scotty Halvenston along with 3 other Blackwater employees? (This incident can be seen in a whole new light if you consider other revelations from Pat Tillman’s death by friendly fire and how that was misrepresented in the media and used as a propaganda tool).
“The deal ends the families’ hopes that a public trial would expose the events that led to Iraqi insurgents killing the four contractors in 2004 and hanging two of their corpses, said Jason Helvenston of Orlando, Fla., brother of slain Blackwater guard Stephen “Scott” Helvenston.
Images from the scene flashed around the world and triggered a massive U.S. military attack on Fallujah that featured street-by-street fighting.
“The lawsuit coming to an end is no surprise to me whatsoever. It was clear that this was going to be a cover-up from the beginning,” Helvenston said Friday. “You just feel the injustice of this long enough, and see that these people are just so evil, all you can do is pray to God that he’ll take care of it because that’s all you’ve got left.”
(Understand that these links are just the tip of a very large iceberg. If you want another challenge, I suggest you challenge your mind to reconcile the issues I presented above. I have come from a similar perspective as the one you now share with the war propaganda machine and I can’t reconcile the information above with the perspectives I once had.)
Jocko is a very likable person with a lot of useful views and lessons learned from his experiences but it concerns me, in his position as an advocate for the war perspectives he shares, that there are so many fundamental issues left unconsidered. I understand that being part of a team and doing your mission is the primary focus in times of war and believing in what you are doing and have done is a big part of it. I can understand the amount of courage it takes to get through the crisis situations you face on the battlefield and I understand that there are many genuine “bad guys” operating on the ground in these war theaters. It may well be, however, that the missions we are engaged in are being compromised at a much higher pay-grade. I don’t think Jocko is the type of person that would want to participate in or send his guys on a mission to fight and perhaps be killed if he understood how it was serving a malevolent cause. The information shared above is compelling in its support of there being a malevolent faction within the US leadership that our military personnel serve. These are very concerning issues which don’t go away just because we ignore them. (Doesn’t the controlled demolition theory of the collapse of building 7 make a lot more sense than the official version? If this is the case would that issue not throw the whole fucking case for what we understand about ‘terrorism’ and ‘ISIS’ into question?)
If you pay attention you can see that other, less celebrated acts of courage and extremely insightful commentary have been on the rise. This is what you will see when you look to those who don’t have a large political propaganda machine behind them and a well-funded platform to speak and act from but, rather, step up to the challenge against all odds and discouragement because they have a conscience that compels them to act; not because it will bring them fame, fortune and friends but because it is absolutely the right thing to do. (Kevin Annette,Ken O’Keefe,

What the two examples I presented above demonstrate is that it’s all connected. Pull one string and you see the whole goddamn thing wiggle! What is happening in Syria by way of subversion (if you look to the history of the conflict and the past international investments in the control of water resources (LINK), is very much related to the Agenda 21 initiatives in Africa, America and worldwide; which is connected to geoengineering (LINK) , which is connected to the 9/11 false flag and the Malheur Occupation. How many degrees of separation? That would be zero! If you consider that the Washington Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) think tank, the CIA and the Pentagon would be heavily involved in developing the goals and objective in the Middle East (PNAC) and promoting the “7 Wars Plan” (LINK) and how individuals within that organization, like Teddy Roosevelt IV (LINK), who is heavily invested in environmental philanthropy and probably aware of the inner workings of 9/11 and how characters involved in that cover-up were involved in other incidents… such as being the special agent in charge at Malheur (MOD IND LINK). There’s a huge network playing behind the scenes that is international, well-funded and well-schooled in the art of deception. This network and all its participants have managed to weaponize everything, from mainstream media and much of the alternative media; energy development and exploitation; healthcare, the environmental movement and even education and have successfully made impotent all the major human rights initiatives through coercive philanthropic activities and in so many other ways.


Until a significant number within the ranks of the protection class and public trust agencies (police, soldiers, public trust managers) are willing to break the mold and recognize the insane nature of the system they are protecting and imposing (abroad and here at home), there will continue to be imbalanced, contention and reactionary outbursts in the communities; either genuine or by implementation through the CIA “strategy of tension” (LINK). (I suppose this will be the case at least until the capacity to defend ourselves and our humanity is finally laid to rest and we are completely subject to the dictates of the vampiric, technocratic global social order (LINK). I encourage public trust managers to deal responsibly with these obvious manufactured conditions and help elevate and restore the balance within themselves and the communities in which they serve. Do this and the violence we are seeing become a way of life will eventually cease to be a major issue, regardless of our level of armament (or lack of) under our 2nd amendment rights. (And, by all means, despite what your public trust managers tell you, resist the urge to pay known state sponsored criminals to help you kill an animal in Africa! These ‘game wardens’ who patrol game preserves and facilitate your hunt are knowingly and willfully supporting and benefiting from the direct assault on human rights and, ultimately, allowing for genocide through their ignorance. This is particularly important to address when you recognize how that ideology is becoming a way of life here ).

Other Related Articles and Efforts of Interest:
1) Off Guardian article: “Why are These Oligarchs so Concerned about African Corruption?”

2) Ken O’Keefe’s latest blog on the World Citizen Initiative: (This initiative shows some promise for providing support to those wanting to withdraw their support (taxes) that are contributing to the human rights abuses and war crimes of their respective states (nations). Much of this post is dealing with the subversion Ken has received but also a legal opinion and commentary on how we might go about making a unified conscious effort to withdraw from this increasing madness.)

3) An interesting connection to ponder: …. Who presides over the “Blue Ribbon Panel” of which most state Fish and Game Directors, including Idaho’s director, area part of, is also a lawyer with the firm Crowell & Moring whose clients extend well into the deep state/ military industrial complex. When the “Blue ribbon Panel” approaches congress for more funding to support “conservation” should we be concerned that this is not what it is promoted to be, but actually in alignment with the globalist Agenda 21 and deep state initiatives? (Much evidence among the things “we don’t talk about” to support such a suspicion!)
Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Practice is one of the largest in the U.S.[11] and has experience with government agreements and subcontracts (domestic or international) including the bidding and award process; ethics and compliance issues, including suspension and debarment; cost accounting rules and defective pricing; claims; audits and investigations; data rights; cybersecurity and privacy; export controls; security clearances; small business issues; domestic preference requirements; and due diligence and transactional assistance relating to mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, and strategic alliances.
Representative matters include a bid protest on behalf of Health Net of the award of a $16 billion Department of Defense (DOD) managed health care contract;[12] securing dismissal of allegations on summary judgment of a False Claims Act case seeking single damages of $1 billion against ACADEMI (formerly Blackwater/Xe Services) under a Department of State security contract in Iraq and Afghanistan; and securing a judgment of over $100 million for SUFI in a breach of contract case against the Air Force’s Non-Appropriated Fund Purchasing Office.[13]
Crowell & Moring represented Blackwater Worldwide in the investigation after a series of deadly shootouts in the Iraqi capital left several Iraqi security agents and civilians dead in May 2007.[14] According to the Legal Times, two other large defense contractors, Erinys Iraq and Kuwait & Gulf Link Transport Co., are among the firm’s clients. Crowell also routinely counsels companies bidding for government contracts and in oversight investigations that sometimes result from those contracts.[15] References[edit]